In July 2025, President Donald Trump signed a series of executive orders that his administration claims will “end woke AI” across the United States. This move is part of his broader AI Action Plan, a strategy designed to accelerate the development of domestic AI technologies, reduce regulatory barriers, and strengthen America’s dominance in the global AI race. The initiative has sparked intense debate, with critics warning that it could dismantle essential safeguards while proponents argue that it will remove ideological bias from AI models.
How to choose the right smartphone for you?
The “AI Action Plan” – A Shift in AI Policy
The AI Action Plan represents a sweeping transformation of US policy toward artificial intelligence. Its goals are threefold:
- Streamlining AI regulations by cutting what the administration calls “bureaucratic red tape.”
- Fast-tracking data center construction to support the exponential demand for computational power.
- Promoting US AI exports to establish American technologies as the global standard.
President Trump’s administration believes these measures are essential to maintaining the country’s technological and geopolitical advantage, particularly against rivals like China, which has been investing heavily in AI chip manufacturing and infrastructure.
“We believe we’re in an AI race, and we want the United States to win that race,” said David Sacks, Trump’s newly appointed “Crypto Tsar,” who also advises on AI policy.
However, what stands out most about this plan is its direct confrontation with what the administration calls “woke” AI.
The Battle Against “Woke” AI
At the heart of the AI Action Plan is a new mandate: federal funding will only go to “politically neutral” AI models, free from influences tied to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies. Trump and his allies argue that major AI companies have been embedding progressive or “woke” ideologies into their models, leading to outputs that they claim are biased against conservative perspectives.
“The American people do not want woke Marxist lunacy in AI models,” Trump declared in a recent speech. “Once and for all, we are getting rid of woke. Is that OK?”
This rhetoric aligns with Trump’s broader political stance against DEI initiatives, which many major US corporations have rolled back since his return to office. For the administration, removing ideological bias is framed as a matter of fairness and accuracy, particularly when AI is used in federal applications ranging from public services to defense.
Data Centers and Infrastructure: Building the AI Backbone
Beyond ideological battles, the AI Action Plan places a heavy emphasis on infrastructure. The administration plans massive investments in data centers, which are the backbone of AI model training and deployment.
To achieve this, Trump’s team is dismantling what it calls “unnecessary environmental restrictions” that have slowed the construction of large-scale computing facilities. By cutting these regulations, the administration hopes to speed up the development of AI-ready infrastructure at home.
This approach also has a strategic dimension. With countries like China rapidly scaling their data center and chip production capabilities, the US risks falling behind if it does not match this pace. Trump frames this as an issue of national security as much as economic competitiveness.
“AI is a revolutionary technology that’s going to have profound ramifications for both the economy and national security,” said David Sacks in an interview with the BBC. “It’s just very important that America continues to be the dominant power in AI.”
Global Exports and Technological Dominance
The AI Action Plan does not stop at domestic policy. A significant part of the strategy is dedicated to boosting AI exports to global markets. By pushing US-made AI technologies abroad, the Trump administration aims to set international standards and counter the growing influence of Chinese tech giants.
This global push is seen as essential to ensuring that American companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and other startups can compete internationally. The administration believes that by dismantling regulatory barriers and promoting AI adoption, the US can extend its leadership across both the public and private sectors.
Controversy and Criticism
Unsurprisingly, the AI Action Plan has drawn sharp criticism. One of the most contentious elements is the removal of safeguards introduced under the Biden administration, which focused heavily on AI ethics, transparency, and risk management.
Critics warn that by prioritizing speed and deregulation, the Trump administration may create risks around AI safety, bias, and misinformation. Jim Secreto, a technology policy expert, noted:
“Accelerating innovation is essential, but dismantling responsible guardrails risks turning America’s AI revolution into a reckless gamble.”
Others argue that while the idea of removing “ideological bias” might sound appealing to some, it is nearly impossible to create a truly neutral AI system. Machine learning models are shaped by the data they are trained on, and eliminating DEI considerations could actually reinforce existing biases rather than remove them.
Industry Response: From Musk to Big Tech
Trump’s stance has found support among some high-profile tech leaders. Elon Musk, who has been outspoken against “woke” culture, launched his own chatbot called Grok, marketed as an “anti-woke AI.” Musk’s comments about the need for politically neutral AI have aligned closely with Trump’s messaging.
However, not all tech companies are pleased. Many AI firms are wary of losing federal contracts if their models are deemed “too ideological.” Others worry that the administration’s focus on cultural battles could overshadow more urgent issues, such as AI safety, deepfake regulation, and intellectual property rights.
Recent controversies — such as Google’s AI image generator producing historically inaccurate depictions — have added fuel to this debate, with conservatives pointing to these incidents as evidence of AI systems pushing progressive agendas.
Balancing Innovation and Ethics
The Trump administration’s approach raises a fundamental question: How do we balance rapid AI innovation with ethical and regulatory considerations?
On one hand, loosening regulations could help the US maintain its technological edge in a world where China and other nations are racing forward with fewer restrictions. On the other hand, removing oversight entirely could lead to harmful outcomes, from biased decision-making in hiring and lending to the unchecked spread of AI-generated misinformation.
Experts like Sarah Myers West, Co-executive Director of the AI Now Institute, emphasize that ethical frameworks are not about slowing progress but ensuring that AI serves the public good. Stripping away these frameworks, they argue, could result in technologies that prioritize corporate or political interests over fairness and safety.
The Road Ahead
As the AI Action Plan rolls out, the US finds itself at a crossroads. Will the country’s push for deregulation and speed give it an unshakable lead in the global AI race, or will the absence of guardrails invite problems that could undermine trust in American technology?
Trump’s hardline stance on “woke” AI is likely to remain a flashpoint in both technology and politics. With AI poised to reshape everything from national defense to creative industries, the stakes could not be higher.
Conclusion
President Trump’s AI Action Plan represents both a bold and controversial step forward. By aiming to strip AI of perceived ideological bias, ramp up data center construction, and expand AI exports, his administration is betting on speed and dominance. Yet, this strategy comes with risks. Removing ethical safeguards might open the door to misuse and erode public confidence in AI systems.
As the global AI arms race intensifies, the US must grapple with a fundamental challenge: Can it lead the world in AI innovation while also upholding values of fairness, transparency, and accountability? Trump’s policies suggest that the answer may depend on how much the nation is willing to compromise in pursuit of victory.